Search for: "Johnson v. Federal Express Corp." Results 141 - 160 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Allstate Corp., 404 F.3d 328, 332 (5th Cir. 2005). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
If popular sovereignty is to survive, it will require more than the commitment of an elite corps of legal scholars. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 24 (1991) [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:26 am by Joy Waltemath
The dissent, however, argued that the focus should have been on the fact that FedEx engaged in interstate commerce and not whether the employee’s particular job would have required him to do so (Samson v Federal Express Corp, March 26, 2014, Huck, P). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
Butler, 13-430; and Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Those arguments are more relevant, and far more prevalent, in non-drug/device cases where the presentation of warnings is not minutely governed by federal law, and unlike prescribing physicians, there are plaintiffs who can’t read English, who have to deal with warnings in workplace settings, or who are just plain knuckleheads in using products. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Chenery Corp., by upholding agency action based on, and by purporting to “defer” to, an interpretation of the Clean Air Act that the EPA itself not only never adopted – but in fact expressly rejected. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:37 am by Todd Dawson
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20 (1991). [read post]