Search for: "Johnson v. Risk" Results 141 - 160 of 1,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by Steve Sady
In Peugh, the Supreme Court, in finding that the ex post facto clause applied to the advisory guidelines, held that an increase in the advisory guideline range creates a “‘significant risk’ of a higher sentence. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:51 am by admin
Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-10, filed in the Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey (Atlantic City) involves the first lawsuit to go to trial over whether Johnson & Johnson’s (“J & J”) Ethicon unit properly designed a vaginal mesh implant and adequately warned of its risks. [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:03 am by pslblogger
The case of Johnson v Medical Defence Union has hit the Court of Appeal, with Mr Johnson still pursuing a claim for breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 in relation to the processing of his personal data in relation to his indemnity insurance policy. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
 [Germany] [Grave risk of harm] [ameliorative measures] [Petition granted]In Radu v Shon, 2021 WL 6197905 ( D. [read post]