Search for: "Light v. Board of Education" Results 141 - 160 of 1,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm by Paul M. Secunda
  In short, much aftermath at the Board in light of Noel Canning and much still to be decided. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of part of the PTO argument, the CAFC noted a conspicuous omission:In a similar vein, the PTO relies on a single sentence from Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
In light of this, granting employment will pose an unreasonable risk to the safety and welfare of the school community. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:35 pm by Seth Borden
  A dissenting Board Member could very likely prevent anything from being passed by simply stepping down prior to a vote, thereby denying the Board a quorum under the holding of the Supreme Court's decision in New Process Steel L.P. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:39 am
Board of Education)--the class action lawsuit. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court issued orders from its conference of Friday, March 3; the justices sent Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:30 am by Nedim Malovic
The applicant appealed the decision to the EUIPO Fourth Board of Appeal (the board). [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am by Michael Geist
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]