Search for: "MERCK SHARP "
Results 141 - 160
of 266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP | Social dialogue at the EPO | Ms Potter's extended copyright | CJEU on TMs' genuine use |… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
The Panel also heard argument from both sides regarding the establishment of MDL No. 2331, involving the hair loss drug Propecia (also knowzoloft, propecia, n as finasteride) and defendants Merck & Co. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
The Panel also heard argument from both sides regarding the establishment of MDL No. 2331, involving the hair loss drug Propecia (also knowzoloft, propecia, n as finasteride) and defendants Merck & Co. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:17 am
In November 2011, Merck Sharp & Dohme paid $950 million to resolve its criminal and civil liabilities related to its promotion and marketing of the painkiller Vioxx. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm
Firstly, a look at the German Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf appeal decision in MERCK SHARP & DOHME V. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:54 am
Merck had to pull the drug from the market, but the damage was done and many people were hurt solely because they requested a drug that had been so widely advertised on TV. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
Three More Lawsuits (Boles, Jellema, and Spano) Set For Trial, And A Special Master Appointed To Conduct Settlement Talks (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) There are currently more than 900 Fosamax lawsuits pending against defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am
The outcome in Acorda v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
Eleonora Rosati discusses the VAT Directive comprising the equal treatment for both printed and electronic publications and its implications on digital exhaustion matters.Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co LimitedGuest Kat Eibhlin Vardy recaps Merck Sharp and Dohme Limited v Shionongi & Co Limited, [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), involving the alleged infringement of Shionogi’s European Patent, entitled… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
.* Pharmaceuticals, Fig Leaves and Accidental Overspill: the Merck-y World of Co-existence AgreementsA mammoth and much-awaited decision from Mr Justice Norris in the long-running trade mark co-existence saga Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme is upon us. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
207/10, Orifarm v Merck Sharpe & Dohme; Paranova v Merck Sharp & Dohme, sped through in pretty good time. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:23 am
Sanofi Pasteur and Merck Sharp & Dohme (the “petitioners”) challenged the validity of the ‘559 patent claims in five inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, arguing they were obvious over prior art references disclosing multivalent pneumococcal vaccines. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Travelers Insurance… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:56 pm
Methods: We inputted all 36 published clinical vignettes from the Merck Sharpe & Dohme (MSD) Clinical Manual into ChatGPT and compared its accuracy on differential diagnoses, diagnostic testing, final diagnosis, and management based on patient age, gender, and case acuity. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
” At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:13 am
Soon after the Dutch customs authorities realized that the generic drugs manufactured in India had existing valid patents for Losartan® in the EU, they informed the company that holds the patents for that drug - Merck Sharp & Dohme - which quickly obtained an injunction to restrain the importation transit procedure".The IPKat keeps getting puzzled by all of this. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., No. [read post]
