Search for: "Marker v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part I begins by placing the Administration’s proposal in context with the authority the Administration already claims under color of Article II of the Constitution of the United States as well as the 2001 AUMF directed at al Qaeda. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
’ State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am
Balikama v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
California and United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
United States (Redux). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:03 am
Those amounts were attributed to (1) the cost of the round trip airline ticket for Petitioner; (2) the cost of the one-way airline tickets for the Children; (3) the cost of the change flight fee for Petitioner; (4) the cost of the private investigator hired to locate theChildren in the United States; and (5) Petitioner and the Children's lodging in the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:27 am
More recently, in Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
From Alabama Gas Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Expectation of privacy underlies decisions in such cases as United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
GAT) as a selectable marker in soybean transformation. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm
Execution of people with documented mental retardation is unlawful in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:45 pm
The United States Supreme has handed down its decision in Navartte v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:10 am
Today the United States Supreme Court decided Navarette v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
Cir. 2007);Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
Finally, United States Patent No. 6,468,559 (“Chen”) […] disclosed a preferred embodiment in which “a dosage form of the invention is administered to a patient . . . preferably once a month. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
All records on the Device described in Attachment A that reference or relate to violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 175 . . . and involve DANIEL HARRY MILZMAN, including: a. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:00 am
Edith Wilmans of Dallas—to hear the case of Johnson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am
The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
