Search for: "Matter of Beard" Results 141 - 160 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2017, 3:03 pm by Whitney Roy
NINTH CIRCUIT FINDS “THREATENED” DESIGNATION FOR BEARDED SEALS PROPER BASED ON NEW LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS Alaska Oil and Gas Ass’n et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:05 am by SHG
No matter how passionate you are for social justice, even lawyers have kids who want to eat. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:55 am by SHG
This is why Free Speech, not to mention the other rights protected by the Constitution, matter. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
But such use of speech as evidence of a person’s motivation (or, for that matter, of what the person actually did) is routine, and doesn’t generally raise a First Amendment problem, see, e.g., Haupt v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
See, also, http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2010/02/applying-faithless-servant-doctrine.html The decisions in Matter #1 and Matter #2 are posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_07299.htm [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of “Business and the Roberts Court” (Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 342), edited by Jonathan H. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 2:28 pm by familoo
Hair strand testing of parents (and other family members) is relatively common in family court cases, especially care proceedings. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:03 am by Robin Shea
 Tell him he has to shave the beard off or lose his job. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:13 am by Jeff Welty
Both codes provide that judges can’t make public comments on pending matters, but may speak about the law and the legal system more broadly, as well as on non-legal subjects. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:13 am by Jeff Welty
Both codes provide that judges can’t make public comments on pending matters, but may speak about the law and the legal system more broadly, as well as on non-legal subjects. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 11:32 am by Guest Blogger
If you remember the $1.5m in fines awarded against Mucci Farms for labeling and fraud convictions earlier this year, this panel should matter to you. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:52 pm by FHH Law
OK, all you current or wannabe high rollers, risk takers, deal makers, thrill seeking bargain hunters, bon vivants … and anybody else, for that matter. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The IRS argued that the enactment of section 71 made the Beard test obsolete. [read post]