Search for: "Maze v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2012, 8:59 am
The AmeriKat relocated from the leafy legal maze of Holborn to the less leafy, but no less legal, maze of Liverpool Street two months ago. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 11:24 am by Kate Fort
To that end, an agreement or memorandum of understanding respecting the jurisdictional authority of both parties could clarify what the County refers to as a “jurisdictional maze. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:10 am by SHG
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman posts part of the Constitution Projects' statement urging Congress to enact legislation to ensure that federal prosecutors fulfill their obligations under Brady v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Michael H. Cohen
App., 4th Dist., 2002), the California Court of Appeal bluntly stated that a particular section of the DSHEA (codified at 21 USC section 343(r)): is not the clearest legislation ever written. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm by admin
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm by Rich Vetstein
Aurora Loan Servicers which considered the very complex maze that is Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by Josh Sturtevant
However, many readers of this blog might be able to agree that state interests don't always align perfectly with the interests of the people. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by Josh Sturtevant
That is that the Supreme Court has itself chosen to leave some of the more important questions concerning with the internet tangled in a complicated maze of Circuit splits. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Venkat
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]
Who will educate you and them about the elder care maze of Medicaid, Medicare, Long Term Care Insurance, Home Care v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Three thousand inmates in New York sued the state corrections bureaucracy in claiming that female inmates are susceptible to rape and sexual abuse because the state does not properly screen, train and supervise its corrections officers. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) Immigration: Court of Appeal confirms Article 8 ECHR need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]