Search for: "Nix v. Nix" Results 141 - 160 of 527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 10:13 am by Laura Orr
Program guests: 1) Bronson James: Defense attorney with JDL Attorneys, representing James Tyler Nix in State of Oregon v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:27 am by On the Net
On December 8, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:42 am
Cohen claimed he made the career switch in December 2005 after Goodmans LLP deferred a decision on elevating him to partner for a second consecutive year.His master plan envisioned a $150,000 annual profit by targeting weak, inexperienced players in small-stakes games, before elevating in the long-term to higher stakes for a $500,000 annual return, the same level he would have made as partner at Goodmans, according to the ruling in Cohen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Julie Lam
In a 4-3 decision, affirming the Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:47 am by On the Net
Supreme Court will hear the oral arguments in the case Garriot v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am by Brad Kuhn
The environmental study for the project is set to be complete in 2014, and the project team has officially nixed the surface freeway option. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm by Jonathan Bailey
However, regarding the programming issue, the debate of whether or not APIs can be copyrighted is a key issue in the Oracle v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:58 am
On the other hand, an appeal of a FINRA finding of willfulness is now on the SEC's radar screen and the ramifications of this academic debate take on very serious real-life consequences.Case In PointIn the Matter of Department of Enforcement, Complainant, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 7:57 am by Renee Newman Knake
  While the Court has been reluctant to "constitutionalize" standards or norms of professional conduct (see Nix v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
Swatting away the claimant’s reliance on Wilson v Great American Industries [1988], he opined that Zappia ‘read[s] too much into too little.'” “Moreover, the judge held that even if Skadden had a conflict of interest, it would not have been material to a reasonable investor, because the information about the firm’s representation of other Sumitomo Group entities was publicly available and did not significantly alter the total mix of information in the… [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:41 am by Dan Bressler
In PACCAR Inc & Ors v Competition Appeal Tribunal & Ors, four out of five justices ruled that such agreements fall within the statutory definition of damages-based agreements (DBAs). [read post]