Search for: "No Named Appellee" Results 141 - 160 of 1,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Duggar alleged that because the records pertained to a juvenile [child sex abuse] investigation, and because Arkansas law prohibited the public release of reports of juvenile investigations, all the names of the juveniles involved, with the exception of his, were redacted, but his parents' names, past and present addresses, and personal information about the family, including the age of Duggar's parents' youngest child, were not redacted, making the names of… [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
The case arose from the Appellees, Kenneth W. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:32 am by Jenny Hohenstein
  If you are looking for a particular brief, you can search this database by Case Name or Docket Number. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:16 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
After briefing and oral argument on the motion, the trial court granted appellee’s motion to dismiss, with prejudice, and included Supreme Court Rule 304(a) language. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
§ 168 to require Allomet to “reissue” its stock certificates in AHMR’s name as contemplated by the R&L Agreement and SPA. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by MBettman
Chapter 4141 adequately protect the public policy of ensuring an employer’s accurate and honest wage reporting without allowing a remedy for appellee, Christine House, and others like her, who may have been fired for reporting this kind of employer misconduct. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:48 pm
Appellees moved jointly to dismiss for forum non conveniens and the district court granted that motion in full, concluding that Malaysia is a more convenient forum to hear all of the appellants’ claims. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm by Bona Law PC
Author: Luke Hasskamp This article—the third in a series—focuses on the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:02 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Appellee provided sufficient and undisputed evidence at summary judgment that the 2013 will is valid in Haiti. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
[Appellee claimed priority based on an Italian registration].The court also ruled that the Board did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider appellant's trade name use because the issue was not raised in the pleadings nor tried by consent. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:25 am by Dennis Crouch
According to Gamon Plus, its two patents claim “designs of displays developed by Appellee Gamon Plus specifically for the display of Campbell Soup cans in stores. [read post]