Search for: "Norman v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
Here is a copy of the order filed this morning by the Indiana Supreme Court, staying the execution of Norman Timberlake. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am by Just Security
Eisen (@NormEisen) What to Expect in the Closings at the Trump Trial by Norman L. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm by Anna Christensen
Wade, but maintaining that state-imposed twenty-four-hour waiting periods and biased counseling before a woman can have an abortion were invalid); and his dissents in Bowers v. [read post]
We've been busy filing an appellate brief and drafting another, so until now, haven't had the chance to post up links about Tuesday's New York Court of Appeals oral argument in Kaur v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
About a century ago, Benito Mussolini called fascist Italy a “totalitarian state,” a concept that he defined with brilliant clarity: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 6:03 am
Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Stephanie Norman, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Friday, April 13, 2018 Editor's Note: John Mark Zeberkiewicz is a Director and Stephanie Norman is an Associate at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued March 23, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Ultra Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
 By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:51 pm
Chandler, 163 F.3d 921, 924 (5th Cir.1999) (holding that "a prisoner must have suffered from the excessive force a more than de minimis injury") and Norman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
 The Court explained, citing this paper by former Guest Kat, Professor Norman Siebrasse (see Norman's blog here), that this was a doctrine from a different era which was based on the view that no one wanted to second guess the Crown in its exercise of granting a patent. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
 The Court explained, citing this paper by former Guest Kat, Professor Norman Siebrasse (see Norman's blog here), that this was a doctrine from a different era which was based on the view that no one wanted to second guess the Crown in its exercise of granting a patent. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:48 am by WSLL
Case Name: DANIEL RAY BOWLSBY v. [read post]