Search for: "Page v. Board of Adjustment"
Results 141 - 160
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
************************************* Every board now knows its company will fall victim to a cyber-attack, and even worse, that the board will need to clean up the mess and superintend the fallout. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Blair of the Ontario Court of Appeal as Chair of the Copyright Board. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
Coming in at 121 pages, the bill is hardly designed for light perusal; we therefore provide page citations (in parentheses) for some of the key changes in the new bill. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm
His conclusion that “hearings last on the average 22 days” (page 37) is highly questionable. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:06 am
”Citing Steele v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Board of Harbor Commissioners (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 729, 741-742.) [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
Robert v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
At that point we had not yet read the Court’s entire 137-page opinion, Tincher v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:55 am
Krousos v Zoning Board of Adjustment of Borough of Paramus, 2014 WL 3628862 (NJ Sup. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
Review Board, 450 U.S. at 718 (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
