Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
Pfizer, Inc., the Federal Circuit had held that it does not. 395 F.3d 1324 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
., United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Board of Education and Tinker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
Supreme Court’s June 23, 2011, 5-4 landmark decision in PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Shire US, Inc., 415 F. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
There are some unique facts here, but in insider trading lingo, trading based on confidential info from an employer looks a lot like “misappropriation” – which the Supreme Court upheld as a theory of liability in 1997, in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:23 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
