Search for: "Samples v. Greene"
Results 141 - 160
of 299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
For most taxpayers, this means that the figure in box 6 is equal to the figure in box 5 times 1.45% (as in my example indicated by the green arrow since $50,000 x 1.45% = $725). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
James Mortimer, Street v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:55 am
What makes for a valid protest is one of those ever green questions that generates litigation before the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
* Big, green and understated: the new Modern Law of PatentsJeremy presents the third edition of The Modern Law of Patents, which Katfriends Ashley Roughton, Phillip Johnson, and Trevor Cook have manufactured with love and just published with LexisNexis. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
SanDiskCorp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Thus I consider a sample consisting of people who have rented in the last 10 years or would consider doing so in the future is perfectly reasonable. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:07 am
Indeed, at oral arguments in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:40 am
She was saving money to apply for lawful permanent residence (a "green card") when, in 2010, her mother died. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:38 am
And Oracle v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
Salazar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
The Sustainable Economies Law Center maintains a legal resource library, Co-opLaw.org in partnership with the Green Collar Communities Clinic (GC3). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:02 am
For most taxpayers, this means that the figure in box 6 is equal to the figure in box 5 times 1.45% (as in my example indicated by the green arrow since $50,000 x 1.45% = $725). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
This is not just another EPO event, a small sample of the almost 100 which the office organises each year. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
’ ” (Green v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
But since by luck we had the detritus of several bombs, the team took samples from the inner casings and soil samples from the bomb impact craters. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:52 am
Fisher v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
They will have to document that they have sampled according to the frequency protocols for the meaningless standard. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
” So, the legal effect of Bridgeport on digital sampling has been vastly overstated. [read post]
