Search for: "Stark County v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 9:05 am by Lyle Denniston
The Kennedy opinion flatly rejected an interpretation of the Marsh case that a Court majority had made in the 1989 decision in Allegheny County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Spencer L. Reames
  A recent case emanating from Kings County Surrogate’s Court, Matter of Kramer, N.Y.L.J. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:03 am by Steve Cornforth
The reason given was that the claimant could sue his lawyers. http://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/2013/11/29/decision-of-the-county-court-folowing-mitchell-romano-v-k-papers-blackburn-ltd/So this is the new world in which we now find ourselves. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Coke's inauguration restored Democratic control in Texas.Imagine if, upon receipt of the Supreme Court order in Bush v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
He [Jan Luba QC] submits that the stark choice the judge perceived to be applicable was between the land being “taken” by the occupiers and the owner being “deprived” of it and the immediate eviction of the occupiers: see paragraphs [83] and [85] of her judgment. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
He [Jan Luba QC] submits that the stark choice the judge perceived to be applicable was between the land being “taken” by the occupiers and the owner being “deprived” of it and the immediate eviction of the occupiers: see paragraphs [83] and [85] of her judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
This voluminous Congressional record stands in stark contrast to the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision this week in Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:39 pm by Justin Levitt
  Since 1979, cities and counties in nine different states, as well as the states of Arkansas and New Mexico have been “bailed in” to a preclearance system. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
In exempting the ‘slave’ victim from the protection of the common law of battery as the state Supreme Court had done in State v. [read post]