Search for: "State v. $18,000" Results 141 - 160 of 261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By 1905 dual system was accepted. 18,000 registrations by 1880. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:36 pm by Lorene Park
His bankruptcy schedules, filled out under penalty of perjury, stated his income at $18,000 for a year that his application, deposition testimony, and a W-2 form listed it as $30,000. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 9:17 am by Rick St. Hilaire
[Sidebar: Alshdaifat, owner of Holyland Numismatics, pleaded guilty on December 21, 2012 to a reduced charge of misdemeanor accessory after the fact in the cultural property case of U.S. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
Dent earned over $18,000 in overtime pay for overtime shifts that she actually worked. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 11:21 pm
This worldwide effort has already resulted in the closure of more than 18,000 unauthorized online pharmacies and recouped about $10.5 million of illegal drugs. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:21 am by Public BLAWG
  That is the question that will now be asked of juries as a result of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:57 am by Lyle Denniston
While the state Supreme Court decision opening marriage to homosexual couples was in effect, before “Proposition 8,” some 18,000 gay marriages were performed in the state. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
   Some 18,000 couples were married in California, during the period between the time the state Supreme Court had ruled that such a right existed under the state constitution and the vote by California voters in November 2008 to take away that right for gays and lesbians. [read post]