Search for: "Time, Inc. v. TIME INC." Results 141 - 160 of 40,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and SuperCooler Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) in 2019, due to the matter being time-barred, Ms. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Time Inc., 245 N.Y.S.2d 723, 725–26 (1963) (holding that it is not defamatory to call someone an "idiot"). [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
”[29] In response to the filings, the Goodman Gallery and AXA denied the claims and are seeking to have the case dismissed.[30] At the end of 2023, the Parties agreed to enter into mediation and have been working to find a mutually agreeable time for mediation.[31] Case 2: Beyer Projects v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during which… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendants nonetheless failed to meet their burden of showing that they lacked "constructive notice of the condition and a reasonable time to correct or warn about its existence" (Parietti v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 29 NY3d 1136, 1137 [2017]).On the issue of constructive notice, defendants relied on the testimony of the school's custodian engineer, who stated that she "usually" conducted daily inspections of the building's doors, during which… [read post]