Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 11:52 am by Danielle Citron
Most importantly, the majority rejected application of either a broad “third party” rule from United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am by CMS
However, following judgment in the earlier Supreme Court case R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, the view taken again was that the UK Act effectively trumped the Scottish Bill, while it awaited the outcome of this constitutional challenge. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am by Marty Lederman
  [UPDATE:  Orin Kerr is right that the decision is obviously redolent of Bush v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
” But as Orin Kerr noted, the Senate proceedings are “a trial, not an appellate argument based only on the record from the House”; “Federalist 65 says that the Senate’s trial ‘can never be tied down by such strict rules ... [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am by CMS
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
The only way to ensure that this does not occur is to preempt the state law standard for setting compensation. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am by Michael Geist
First, a unanimous court in the song previews reset the law with an emphasis once again on balance and user rights: In Theberge v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]