Search for: "United States v. Lee" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 10:59 am by Barry Sookman
The cases summarized in the slides below canvass developments in a number of countries and include cases from Canada, United States, UK, Ireland, Australia, and Israel. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am by Jane Chong
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:30 am by Jane Chong
Alternatively, sovereign immunity applies to Plaintiff’s nonconstitutional claims, as the Westfall Act provides that the United States is the proper defendant for these claims and the Government has not waived sovereign immunity here. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am by Conor McEvily
  At JURIST, Eric Segall discusses Fisher in the context of the same-sex marriage cases,  United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
When I reported yesterday on a May 10 letter from a bipartisan group of United States Representatives to the ITC concerning injunctive relief over FRAND-pledged standard-essential patents (SEPs) in connection with the investigation of Samsung's complaint against Apple, I had not yet seen a similar letter written by four United States Senators. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
Unfortunately, the Dutch Supreme Court came to the opposite conclusion and held in Sara Lee v Integro (Case C02/227HR) that an essential element must be one which distinguished the invention from the prior art. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"we're ashamed that the president of the United States is from Texas." [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]