Search for: "In re B. G." Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2015, 5:40 pm by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, as the lecture is this Thursday.] [read post]
  They will refer to the following non-exclusive factors[13]: [W]hether that person— a) would fairly and adequately act in the interests of the class members; b) does not have, in relation to the common issues for the class members, a material interest c) that is in conflict with the interests of class members; d) if there is more than one applicant seeking approval to act as the class representative in respect of the same claims, would be the most suitable; e) will be able to… [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Décision À la lumière des critères établis dans R. c. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Should the exemption nonetheless be denied, perhaps on the grounds that allowing blunt knives would either let people carry sharp knives claiming they’re blunt, or require too much checking on the part of police, guards, and others? [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  NYC has proposed to ban “flushable” claims unless they’re certified by a third party test approved by NYC. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Moreover, the defendants argue, Judge Berman himself, in a 2010 decision in the Société Générale securities class action lawsuit held that unlisted ADRs of a foreign issuer that trade over-the-counter could not serve as the basis for 10(b) claims under Morrison. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Chefs nos 1, 2 et 8, soit le complot de fraude, la complicité pour fraude entre les deux accusés et la fraude additionnelle par Michaud pendant le mandat de Berniquez St-Jean: À la lumière des trois critères établis dans R. c. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:35 am by SHG
(g) An unsecured surety bond. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Douglas E. Abrams
Okla.) recently considered whether to approve a compromise in In re Gordon, the contending lawyers in the Chapter 7 proceeding detoured into written lawyer-on-lawyer invective. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The terrain is irregular and mountainous; we’re stuck with metes and bounds, but then we need to use their tools—always try to preserve validity. [read post]