Search for: "J. M. v. C. M." Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,903
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2015, 2:10 pm by Marta Requejo
Comentario a la STJUE, Sala Cuarta, de 18 de diciembre de 2014, asunto C- 449/13, CA Consumer Finance sa v I. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:00 am by Douglas Marques
Já a marca é um sinal distintivo, e seu registro perante o INPI dá ao titular o direito de usá-la com exclusividade. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Il y a donc un véritable arrêt des procédures. [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:01 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Carmen Vélez y su pareja Ángeles Acosta; el senador Ramón Luis Nieves y la Lcda. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:01 pm by Douglas Marques
Mas foi na corrida das ruas de Mônaco, sob a chuva, que a lenda de Ayrton nasceu. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) With this post Flora Sapio and I (and friends from time to time) continue an experiment in collaborative dialogue. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A mutant ketol-acid reductoisomerase enzyme according to claim 6 wherein: a) the residue at position 47 has an amino acid substation selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, F, G, I, L, N, P, H, T, E and Y; b) the residue at position 50 has an amino acid substitution selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, E, F, G, M, N, V, W and I; c) the residue at position 52 has an amino acid substitution selected from the group consisting of A,… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:01 pm by Douglas Marques
O dano, no entanto, não gera dever de indenizar quando a vítima do erro que já possuir registros anteriores, e legítimos, em cadastro de inadimplentes. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Enfin, même s’il s’agissait d’un contrat de transport, l’absence de préavis n’aurait pas été fatale, car celui-ci n’est pas nécessaire lorsque c’est le transporteur lui-même qui avise le propriétaire du bien des dommages et lorsqu’il est déjà au courant des faits qu’on lui reproche, comme c’est le cas en l’espèce. [read post]