Search for: "Lawrence v. Lawrence" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2016, 10:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
.'s support for the first eugenics practices (see Buck v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 Remaining in the zone of patent law, PatLit carries a guest blog from the Wragge Lawrence Graham duo of Paul Inman and Andrew Maggs on inventive step and the role of the "obvious to try" test in Teva v Leo [Merpel posted on this very case yesterday, so now you have two commentaries to consider]. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 3:17 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This arbitration clause was not good enough, and the plaintiffs win the appeal.The case is Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm by WIMS
Deferral for CO2 Emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs ("Deferral Rule"), 76 Fed. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, Judge Lawrence concluded that subpart (i) did not preclude coverage. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:49 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Here is what the state said in its brief opposing certiorari: The Fifth Circuit granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the following question: “[W]hether Roberts has been overruled by Lawrence [ v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
” Other coverage of the denial in the Wisconsin case comes from Lawrence Hurley of Reuters. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
  A professor from LMU -- Lawrence Kalbers -- is interested in the VW "Dieselgate" scandal, so submits a FOIA request for various documents; in particular, the reports submitted to the DOJ by the Monitor after VW's guilty plea, as well as the evidence that VW told investors in its annual report that it showed the DOJ at the time. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am by Nabiha Syed
Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire reports on the two cases on this issue, Decker v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 10:22 am by Zachary Spilman
Did the military judge err by instructing the members of the lesser included offense of consensual sodomy, and not dismissing the charge as unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Lawrence v. [read post]