Search for: "Mr. X" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2011, 10:35 am by David Lat
It was a warm and wonderful occasion, a chance to reconnect with old friends and to catch up with the O’Scannlains (Judge and Mrs. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:22 am
" "After reading this document, nobody can claim with a clear conscience that the evidence cited by Mr. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am by familoo
Judges are specifically cautioned against delivering a decision before they have fully considered their reasons – precisely because a judge can be clear in her mind that she is going to do X, but the process of analysing and setting out the evidence and applying the law can reveal that X was in fact the wrong answer – and thus the decision will be Y. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Including "don't use x until we can figure out who x belongs to," which is not far from this case (though the fact that the seized material has already been reviewed might be a relevant distinction). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]