Search for: "State v Edge"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2013, 10:15 am
No squishing around the edges. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
The case is Scenic America, Inc, Plaintiff,. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Prince v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
In a recently reported case out of the Northern District of Ohio (Lazette v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Since Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
Since Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 3:04 am
That appears to be the case in State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
Since Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:12 am
However, when the misconduct is the supervisor’s own, the employer in such instance has no “eyes and ears,” the court stated. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 4:52 am
READ the FULL TEXT INDICTMENT United States of America v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
You are likely in a state of shock. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court's decision in K Mart Corp. v. [read post]
