Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 9,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 1:17 pm
Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:26 am
The SRRP failed on this ground as well. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
"It is well-settled that should the employee fail to appear at the disciplinary hearing as scheduled, the appointing authority may elect to proceed with the disciplinary action and actually hold a hearing in absentia rather then merely proceed to impose a penalty on the individual simply because of the employee's failure to appear as scheduled [see Mari v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:41 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:24 am
Probably just as well. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 2:15 pm
Haws v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Board of Chosen Freeholders (based on the need to maintain safety and exclude contraband), a decision I criticized here, as well as frisks of suspects on only reasonable suspicion to believe they are armed and presently dangerous, in Terry v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
Fairhold Mercury Ltd v HQ (Block 1) Action Management Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 487 (LC)Fairhold (Yorkshire) Ltd v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 502 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 7 Sunny Gardens RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 509 (LC)No.1 Deansgate (Residential) Ltd v No.1 Deansgate RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 580 (LC)Pineview Ltd v 83 Crampton Street RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 598 (LC)Assethold Ltd v 13-24 Romside Place RTM Co Ltd [2013] UKUT 603 (LC)Ninety… [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
Drawing on the test of apparent bias in Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357 (one of my all-time favourites, I’ve got to admit), he found that the Minos Perdios website did not convey that real danger of bias to an objective and well-informed observer (at [57]). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:26 pm
” Limones v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
Klotz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
’Huff v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
The police found jewelry and other items taken from Duenas's apartment, as well as a lock-picking kit. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:11 pm
In Chiafolo v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 3:30 am
Let’s look at this recent opinion in Beamon v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:02 am
The Justices heard oral argument in two other cases yesterday, as well. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 10:15 pm
Well, check the docket. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
It was enacted in 1984 to `target hackers who accessed computers to steal information or to disrupt or destroy computer functionality, as well as criminals who possessed the capacity to access and control high technology processes vital to our everyday lives. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am
Today, coverage continues of yesterday's oral arguments in Al-Maqaleh v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:50 pm
It relied on Bryson v. [read post]
