Search for: "DOE" Results 1621 - 1640 of 546,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2024, 10:34 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  That is certainly not nothing, but does no one remember that the Republicans have already had their fantasy election, and lost? [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 10:22 am by hpoppe
This fall season, take a moment to send a card to a nursing home resident, or participate in a local nursing homes trick-or-treat with your kids – it really does make a difference to the residents! [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 10:05 am by David J. Clark
”  The Supreme Court held that “nothing in the text of subsection (a) mandates that a restrictive covenant contain an explicit geographic term, nor does subsection (a) prohibit a covenant’s geographic area from being expressed in implied terms. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:28 am by Jan Weißgerber and Elisa Saier
The employer’s duty to record working hours, as decided by the European Court of Justice on May 14, 2019 (C-55/18), and the Federal Labor Court on Sep-tember 13, 2022 (1 ABR 22/21), does not shift the burden of proof to the employer. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:18 am by David Oxenford
This allocation is done in an internal station record, which does not need to go into the public file and does not need to be revealed to the candidate. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:14 am by Wells Parker and Kayla Weiser-Burton
Earlier this summer, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals issued a decision affirming the lower court’s decision that the Mining Law of 1872 does not impose a limit on the number of mill sites that a mining claimant may use for ancillary purposes.[1] Section 42 of the Mining Law of 1872 provides that the holder of a mining claim may also locate nearby non-mineral-bearing-land for the purposes of “mining” and “milling” activities.[2] In 1997, the Department… [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
This language does not accuse the plaintiff of actual conduct—for example, as the trial court noted, it does not claim that the plaintiff prevented anyone from voting or personally lied to "protect his supposed privilege and power. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew Guariglia
” As Chief Justice John Roberts said in the majority opinion: “Given the unique nature of cell phone location records, the fact that the information is held by a third party does not by itself overcome the user’s claim to Fourth Amendment protection. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 9:00 am by divi
The court reinforced the position that COVID-19 does not constitute “direct physical loss or damage to property” for insurance claims. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 8:42 am by Eugene Volokh
" The Court finds that the fact that the defendant produces its nationwide publication from New York does not provide New York with a greater interest or "more significant interest" in this matter than New Jersey where the plaintiff suffered the greatest reputational harm and had to alter his day-to-day life to not suffer more. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 8:29 am by Tara Sklar
However, the IMLC does not offer a telehealth licensure option for physicians who only want to deliver health care via telehealth in a state, and not necessarily meet with patients in-person in that state. [read post]
AR agreement does not clearly state the regulated activities the AR is permitted to carry out. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:05 am by Shadi Sadr
During the April 2024 session of the Sixth (Legal) Committee of the U.N. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:02 am by jordan
Hiring a car accident lawyer does not cost you anything from your pocket. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' requests for sanctions against, and disqualification of, the Attorney General were properly denied, explaining the record shows that "the Attorney General made reasonable arguments which did not in any manner justify the imposition of sanctions" (See 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; Matter of Doe v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 172 AD3d 1691; Matter of Cobado v Benziger, 163 AD3d 1103). [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, opined the Appellate Division, Petitioners' requests for sanctions against, and disqualification of, the Attorney General were properly denied, explaining the record shows that "the Attorney General made reasonable arguments which did not in any manner justify the imposition of sanctions" (See 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c]; Matter of Doe v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 172 AD3d 1691; Matter of Cobado v Benziger, 163 AD3d 1103). [read post]