Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 1641 - 1660 of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 1:23 pm by Howard Knopf
Gilles McDougallA/Secretary General | Secrétaire général par int.Copyright Board of Canada | Commission du droit d'auteur du Canada56 Sparks, Suite| Bureau 800Ottawa ON K1A 0C9Telephone | Téléphone 613.952.8624Gilles.mcdougall@cb-cda.gc.ca ************************************** [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 11:15 am by Andrew Frisch
In determining whether to compel discovery of tax returns, the court applies a two prong test: “(1) the tax returns must be relevant to the subject matter of the action, and (2) a compelling need must exist because the information is not readily obtainable from a less intrusive source. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:37 am by Oona Hathaway
Hathaway, Gerard D. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law at Yale Law School. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Commonwealth, supra.The opinion then notes that[d]uring voir dire, the prosecutor acknowledged and discussed the statements made on Facebook with the potential jurors. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:51 am
 The court found that plaintiffs offered no reason why the litigation of other matters constituted a reasonable delay. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm by Marie Louise
The EarthGrain Co. k/n/a Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Reservation of right to appeal claim construction prompting stipulated judgment does not create substantial controversy as to declaratory judgment counterclaims: The Fox Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 8:44 am by Phil Dixon
Context matters—the potential relevance and probative value of the proposed Rule 412 evidence will depend on what the other evidence and defenses are in the case. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:36 am by John J. Sullivan
  It’s kind of appropriate, though, because the court’s opinion n Lateef v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:51 am by Andrew Frisch
Finally, the court dismissed plaintiffs argument that, as a practical matter, the “vast majority” of them use their Annual Leave for scheduled absences, meaning that any leftover hours cashed-out are, in effect, for sick leave, due to the lack of evidence in support of this proposition. [read post]