Search for: "STATE v B J J J" Results 1641 - 1660 of 6,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In the particular case at hand, s73(2)(b) and (3) means that copyright is [was] not infringed "if and to the extent that the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is re-transmitted by cable and forms part of a qualifying service".The broadcasters appealed Arnold J's decision. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by David Cosgrove
Retrieved from http://www.fortune.com/2016/04/06/retirement-savings-fiduciary-rule/ [vii](Brown, J., 2016, April 6) [viii]Campbell, B. (2016, April 11) DOL Fiduciary Rule: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly [Electronic format]. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
” Hacked Off has an article covering the Independent Press Recognition Panel’s sixth Annual State of Recognition Report, which was highly critical of the industry-controlled press complaints handler, IPSO. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am by Evan Lee
United States, which interpreted the provision in Section 924(c)(1)(B)(ii) providing specific punishments for Section 924(c) crimes involving machineguns. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
PeerJ Preprints 5:e3100v1 doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v1 , peerj.com/preprints/3100v1/ Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. (2017) The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The division among the justices in Ramos is quite something: GORSUCH, J., announced the judgment of the Court, and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II–A, III, and IV–B–1, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined, an opinion with respect to Parts II–B, IV–B–2, and V, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Part IV–A, in… [read post]