Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 1661 - 1680 of 2,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Boston & Maine R.R., 96 Me. 207, 217–218, 52 A. 771, 774 (1902) (“Quantitative probability, however, is only the greater chance. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am by Adam Wagner
The following is extracted from the Supreme Court’s press summary: The court considers three issues: (1) do the conditions of entitlement for SPC give rise to direct discrimination? [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:15 am by Chimene Keitner
As Marko rightly notes, and as I discuss in the article (pp. 96-98), the case of the United Kingdom is peculiar insofar as the U.K. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[3.3] Thus the question to be answered is whether claim 1 of the amended auxiliary requests covers the use of an extract which was not covered by claim 1 as granted. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:27 pm by Mike
Plaintiffs object that this was not “a timely”supplement, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e)(1). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
 You have to ask, does what this person say achieve the objective of persuading people to behave better? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
P has a mental age of 2 1/2, while Q has a mental age of 4 to 5. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the Board does not consider an indication of the concrete allegation to be proved (Angabe eines konkreten Beweisthemas) to be necessary. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
In particular, the disclosure of document E4a does not exclude a pivotable optical receiver functioning with a stationary light source or without any scanning (antastend) emitted light beam (e.g. when a pivotable distance meter based on image acquisition is used). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
IPXL comes up:The district court held that Statistical Interface claims 1, 2, and 83 of the ’893 patent are indefinite under IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am by Maria Roche
  The evidence is that there are generally fewer hearings where both parties are represented  [§96(b)] and hearings are less likely to overrun [§96(h)]. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Once this evidence is available, post-published evidence may be taken into account to back up these findings (see decision T 609/02 [9]). [5] The application does not provide any experimental data proving that an adenovirus of claim 1 is able to replicate in cells having an activated Ras-pathway but not in normal cells. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by admin
The FSOC is still setting up its new risk management architecture, and recently asked for comment on how it might determine whether certain firms pose risks (96 BBR 129, 1/25/11)… Read this entire article for free, activate your free 15 day trial access to Banking Report now. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:21 am
In Article 3(1) of Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases what is meant by "databases which, by reason of the selection or arrangement of their contents, constitute the author's own intellectual creation" and in particular: a) should the intellectual effort and skill of creating data be excluded? [read post]