Search for: "In re J. A. P." Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm by Robert Tanha
See Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta.), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313, at p. 368, Machtinger v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Cooper, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 146, at p. 159). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
     More unfair advantage, but only where the goods are “luxury” enoughKenzo Tsujimoto v EUIPO, Joined Cases C‑85/16 P and C‑86/16 P, CJEU (May 2018)Kenzo is a French fashion house with Japanese roots. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
Justices Middleton, Jagot and Moshinsky identified three errors of principle in Justice Perram’s evaluation of ‘strong reasons’, enabling them to re-evaluate whether strong reasons existed. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
United States, 219 F. 2d 10, 12–14 (CA2 1955) (Harlan, J.) [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Carl Cranor’s Conflicted Jeremiad Against Daubert It seems that authors who have the most intense and refractory conflicts of interest (COI) often fail to see their own conflicts and are the most vociferous critics of others for failing to identify COIs. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile, as Roy Greenslade reported, the Port Talbot Magnet project in South Wales is asking the public to donate £150 to sponsor a court reporter for a day, as part of its P! [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
.; and/or (j) all claims arising from or relating directly or indirectly to the disclosure by us . . . of any non-public personal information about you.As security for the loans, the Borrowers provided postdated personal checks made out to Cash Biz for the amount of the loan plus a finance charge. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
 at ___ (Martinez, J., dissenting).In this Court, the Borrowers assert the same substantive arguments that they did in the court of appeals. [read post]