Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 1661 - 1680 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
In its decision, the SJC noted that “‘[g]enerally, under Massachusetts law, defense counsel’s failure to inform a defendant of collateral or contingent consequences of a plea does not render a plea involuntary[,]’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am by Daniel Cappetta
In its decision, the SJC noted that “‘[g]enerally, under Massachusetts law, defense counsel’s failure to inform a defendant of collateral or contingent consequences of a plea does not render a plea involuntary[,]’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
   g) Tarion and Condo Conversions In condo conversion scenarios, Tarion will not provide warranties on the common elements. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
   g) Tarion and Condo Conversions In condo conversion scenarios, Tarion will not provide warranties on the common elements. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Alex Young
   g) Tarion and Condo Conversions In condo conversion scenarios, Tarion will not provide warranties on the common elements. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:40 am by Roel van Woudenberg
However, according to the established case law, Rule 116(1) EPC (former Rule 71a EPC 1973) should not be construed as an invitation to file new evidence or other material departing from the legal and factual framework of issues and grounds pleaded (see T 39/93, headnote) as established with the notice of opposition according to Rule 76(c) EPC (former Rule 55(c) 1973, see G 9/91, point 6 of the Reasons). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 2:45 am by Miquel Montañá
This case law stems from the Decisions handed down by the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal on 25 March 2015 in cases G 2/12 and G2/13, which are nicknamed, respectively, “Tomatoes-II” and “Broccoli-II,” to distinguish them from “Tomatoes-I” (G 1/08 )and “Broccoli-I” (G 2/07). [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:33 am by Simran Bakshi
While there are exceptions that provide for an unequal division of property, it is only applicable in limited and extraordinary and unfair of circumstances.Pursuant to section 5(6) of the Family Law Act:The court may award a spouse an amount that is more or less than half the difference between the net family properties if the court is of the opinion that equalizing the net family properties would be unconscionable, having regard to: (a) a spouse’s failure to disclose to the other… [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:26 am by Alfred Brophy
The position is a nontenure-track position with security reasonably similar to tenure, as provided by ABA Standard 405(c). [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Side City Studios Inc., 2016 QCCA 1810 [63] En acceptant de procéder comme il l’a fait, c’est-à-dire sans gérer le dossier ni fixer l’audition de la demande d’injonction interlocutoire, le Tribunal a compromis les droits des appelants Limouzin, Larouche et BLU. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:12 am
That framework, mirroring the structure of human rights due diligence itself (UNGP ¶ 17 et seq) involves (a) setting expectation, (b) mechanisms to set and manage expectations through ownership arrangements, (c) the relationship between the state and SOE boards of directors, (d) oversight and follow up mechanisms, (e) capacity building obligations, (f) imposing human rights due diligence obligations on SOEs, (g) disclosure requirements, transparency and reporting, and (h)… [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 12:11 pm by Howard Knopf
” [22] To resolve this matter I need only decide whether the conduct Blacklock's impugns is protected under the fair dealing provisions of the Act and, in particular, section 29. [read post]