Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 1661 - 1680 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2016, 9:19 pm by Walter Olson
Oregon State University holds racially segregated retreats [Peter Hasson, Daily Caller] More: University of Connecticut building segregated housing for (some) black male students [Campus Reform] Sometimes there really is a good case for taking the names of evil long-dead men off public university buildings, especially if the alternative is to throw a $700,000 subsidy at a murderer-themed café that can’t make it on food sale revenues [The College Fix; UCSD’s Che Guevara… [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Rutherford & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2016] EWCA Civ 29 The Court of Appeal tackles the bedroom tax and discrimination again, and, a year on from MA & Ors, there is quite a difference. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
Nothing in the legislation indicates who will pay for the services of a Special Master. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Perry Dane, Master Metaphors and Double-Coding in the Encounters of Religion and State, (San Diego Law Review, Vol. 52, 2015).Ilana Finefter-Rosenbluh & Lotem Perry-Hazan, Teacher Diversity and the Right to Adaptable Education in the Religiously-Oriented School: What Can We Learn from Students’ Perceptions? [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am by JB
The Constitution is silent on how to fulfil this duty, leaving the question to all three branches of government consistent with their institutional roles.An aside: In Luther v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Where, as here, "the parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator, courts generally play a limited role," citing New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321;2. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
On 11 January 2016 Master Gordon-Saker handed down judgment in the case of BNM v Mirror Group [2016] EWHC B1 (Costs). [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
  In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]