Search for: "STATE v. WISE"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 3,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 5:53 pm
,Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
In coining the term, the AICPA wisely indicated that there was no single definition as to what constituted “Fair Value,” rather, it was determined by the law of each individual State. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm
The Court continues to build on its recent record of unanimous decisions, ruling in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
In particular, Kammen tells the court, he would like the court to order the use of a defense security officer (“DSO”) who is within the defense’s attorney-client privilege bubble, as like has been done in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:21 pm
If you feel the need to read more, see State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
Louzon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
Perhaps the construction of such a genetic panopticon is wise. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
Perhaps the construction of such a genetic panopticon is wise. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Even if not required, it is always wise, to notarize. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the… [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:57 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, May 22, 2013:Suspended and facing ethics case, Alabama judge blames president jurist, claims she rebuffed advances Are smartphones computer systems under the Criminal Code? [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:29 am
State, 109 So. 3d 874 (Fla. [read post]
19 May 2013, 9:12 am
Livshits v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:01 pm
An arrest is a “seizure” for Fourth Amendment purposes, but under a case called United States v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 7:47 am
Cranor, “Milward v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:22 pm
Robart's Microsoft v. [read post]
