Search for: "Stanford Law Communications" Results 1681 - 1700 of 2,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Bernadette Meyler looks at the “outsized role” of the common law in the opinions. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Wells posted a call for papers from Stanford Journal of International Law. [read post]
19 May 2023, 6:00 am by Gene Takagi
Fred Nelson, @JessicaSweidan, @torbjorngjefsen, Bryson Ogden @Ran9erB & @SolangeBandiaky on moving from pledges to action Better Climate Funding Means Centering Local and Indigenous Communities For Purpose Law Group: CA’s Budget & Nonprofits: Part Three NY Times: Black taxpayers have been far more likely to be audited than others, the IRS said on Monday. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 9:06 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The first members of the Board were announced in May 2020 and include Helle Thorning-Schmidt, former Prime Minister of Denmark, Tawakkol Karman, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Michael McConnell, Director of Stanford’s Constitutional Law Center, and many other diverse leaders and thinkers from around the world. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:36 pm
I have only counted this litigation once, as has, for example, the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse (as shown here). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, January 25, 2019 Tags: BlackRock, Corporate Social Responsibility, ESG, Institutional Investors, Long-Term value, Management, Shareholder value, Stakeholders, Stewardship Dealing with Activist Hedge Funds and Other Activist Investors Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 25, 2019 Tags: Board communication, Boards of… [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:20 pm by Jackson Nichols
In a forthcoming article in the Stanford Law Review, Sharmila L. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 am by Gene Takagi
For more on Purpose-Driven Board Leadership, see The Four Principles of Purpose-Driven Board Leadership (Anne Wallestad, Stanford Social Innovation Review); Purpose-Driven Board Leadership (BoardSource); and Purpose-Driven Board Leadership, Legally Speaking (Nonprofit Law Blog). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Again linked to the facts of the above cases, but in this appeal the Court will consider the meaning of paragraphs 20 and 27 of the Electronic Communications Code as set out in Schedule 3A to the Communications Act 2003. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:10 pm
Lunsford, a professor of English at Stanford, says "that students feel much more impassioned by the new literacy. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Mark Lemley, Stanford Law SchoolTrademark Use Requirement in Dilution Primarily a descriptive argument: (1) We've had a form of TM use requirement in the dilution statute for the past 10 years; (2) it worked pretty well; (3) the requirement is strengthened in the TDRA. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:28 am by Schachtman
The story also cites Patricia Zettler, a former FDA attorney, who now teaches at Stanford Law School, for her doubts that the case will matter to most scientists. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by P.J. Blount
Télécommunication – Observation – Navigation – Défense – Exploration. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Recently, many people were appalled when students shut down a federal appellate judge from speaking at Stanford Law School. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
For Purpose Law Group: About Those Massive Unrestricted Grants …. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
 Justice Moulton graduated from Stanford University in 1983 with a B.A. in International Relations and received his J.D. from Columbia Law School in 1986.Honorable Jeffrey K. [read post]
21 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This entry in the Legal Theory Lexicon provides a rough and ready introduction to speech act theory pitched at law students (especially first-year law students) with an interest in legal theory. [read post]