Search for: "BLACK v. MAY." Results 1701 - 1720 of 7,552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am by John Elwood
It’s not just that I’m pressed for time, though I am: As I type this, the power is out for my entire neighborhood, and I sit hunched over my laptop in inky blackness. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by Donald Thompson
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm by Jason Kelley
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:46 am by David Lat
She concluded by articulating her opposition to judges legislating from the bench.O’Donnell may not be a witch — but she may understand the proper role of a judge better than many who wear the black robes.Christine O’Donnell can’t name Supreme Court case [Politico] Christine O’Donnell: SNL Spoof Of ‘I’m Not A Witch’ Ad ‘Really Funny’ [Huffington Post / AP] [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:30 am by David Kravets
Five judges in the 2011 opinion wrote separately that the courts should abandon that precedent, Tinker v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm by Russell Knight
”  Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019) If “plaintiffs established a fiduciary relationship and an abuse of that relationship, they [are] entitled to an accounting” Kurtz v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 1:37 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
Many of you who read this blog will know that last week, there was a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion on Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
In 1992, such an interpretation may have been more common, but today, in the face of the proliferation of meta-analyses, the risk of such interpretations of single study outcomes is remote. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Supp. 2d184, 190 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY670 (9th ed. 2009)). [read post]