Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
58 of process) the defender admitted the pursuers’ averments in the damages action anent breach of the covenants under the Service Agreement and the Share Purchase Agreement. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
’774 patent col. 2 l. 58–col. 4 l. 38 (ex parte reexamination certificate). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 11:41 am
The Document Containing the Charges contains accusations of sexual violence against children and adults, (paras 1-5, 14, 33, 41, etc.) but the description of the facts focuses on rape against women and girls. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:54 am
First Nat'l Bank in Edinburg, 55 S.W.3d 58, 68 (Tex. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Id. at 57-58. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm
Taggert,58 U.S. 74, 85 (1854) (noting that reissued patentsmust be “for the same invention as the original patent”);Klein v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
For 58 years, the Siler family shares bull dogs. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
***” The 95% certainty appears to derive from 95% confidence intervals, although “confidence” is a technical term in statistics, and it most certainly does not mean the probability of the alternative hypothesis under consideration. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 10:45 am
” What does that mean? [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
While the specification discloses examples and embodiments where the virtual classroom is depicted as a “map” or “seating chart,” nowhere does the specification limit the graphical display to those examples and embodiments. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:55 am
[1] AIB Group (UK) Plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2012] EWHC 35 (Ch), per HHJ Cooke at paragraph 24 [2] Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] AC 412 [3] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2013] EWCA Civ 45, per LJ Patten at paragraph 47 [4] AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 58, per Lord Toulson at paragraph 64 [5] ibid., per Lord Reed at paragraph 137 [6] Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton and Co (1 [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 363, 58 S.Ct. 872, 874, 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938).* * * Historically, federal sentencing—the function of determining the scope and extent of punishment—never has been thought to be assigned by the Constitution to the exclusive jurisdiction of any one of the three Branches of Government. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
President, the federal view of cannabis simply does not accord with reality. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
President, the federal view of cannabis simply does not accord with reality. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
The public does not accept its authority to make such a declaration. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:12 am
Supp.2d 244, 257-58 (D. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
That these are determinative factors for the purposes of Articles 4(1) and 4(2) does not exclude them from consideration under 4(3). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
58. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
The 2012 report follows a similar pattern: Only .6%, or 58 requests, dealt with terrorism cases. [read post]
