Search for: "Reed v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 2,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
” United States The creators of the Netflix series “When They See Us” are being sued for defamation. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Reed, Morse v LoveLive TV US, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51481(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Dec. 15, 2020], considered Darcy‘s concept of “informal dissolution” and its implications for individual controller liability. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011)  Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm by Robert Chesney
  In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
As she states: "few others outside of the profession ... seem to have fully appreciated what has already happened and cannot be changed". [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
If the mouse weighs heavily in your hand and you can't be bothered to click, but just want to know the question, this is it: "Are non-Community goods bearing a Community trade mark which are subject to customs supervision in a Member State and in transit from a non-Member State to another non-Member State capable of constituting "counterfeit goods" within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation 1383/2003/EC if there is no evidence to suggest that… [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘The result was that the arbitrator awarded a massive windfall to Humana,’ Walgreens’ attorneys at Reed Smith said in the court filing. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am by Schachtman
Silica Co. in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, in Irwin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:58 am by Michael Lombardino and Abby Kotun
Employers should consult with their Reed Smith attorneys for further advice regarding the impact of the Court decision on their workplace practices and what steps they should consider taking. __________________________ [1] USCIS, USCIS Statement on Supreme Court’s DACA Decision, June 19, 2020, available at https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/uscis-statement-supreme-courts-daca-decision. [2] Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 10:42 am by Amy Treppass and Michael D. Smith
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently considered the issue of covert recordings in Phoenix House Ltd v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am by Scott Bomboy
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
Instead of deciding that there should be a statutory compensation scheme backed by the state (as per a very limited English version) , the law decided that pleural plaques amounted to bodily injury. [read post]