Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 1741 - 1760 of 10,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am by John G. Papianou
It turns out you can’t get rid of a putative class action by offering complete individual relief to a named plaintiff. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am by John G. Papianou
It turns out you can’t get rid of a putative class action by offering complete individual relief to a named plaintiff. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Wiley of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Health Law & Policy Matters Racial talk at work? [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
When faced with the dual problems of an unconstitutional and bad law and a tricky process designed to evade review, CJ Roberts’ solution wasn’t so much a solution as a time out. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:46 am by Steve Bainbridge
Robert Goddard: Lord Davies' report and recommendations were published earlier today: see here (pdf). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am by Ronald Collins
” What courts decide really matters, so who decides also matters. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:50 am by Matt Osenga
They seem to be – CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, they don’t have a choice, right? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:42 am by Danielle Citron
But librarians understood that intellectual privacy matters. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
District Judge Robert Schroeder rejected Maxell’s motion, finding that DLA Piper timely put in place an ethical wall screening attorney Justin Park — who moved from Mayer Brown to DLA Piper — from disclosing any confidential Maxell information with anyone at his new firm and every DLA Piper attorney working on Apple matters was told not to communicate with Park about Maxell, according to the order. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:22 am by James Bickford
  On his Plum Line blog at the Washington Post, Greg Sargent suggests that “[t]he most likely scenario is a SCOTUS decision next spring,” though he argues that “the fate of ACA in the courts isn’t likely to matter much” in next year’s presidential election. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am by Venkat
Venkat starts us off:] In re Robert Edward Forchion, Jr., 2011 WL 3834929 (Ca. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim and Robert Barnes report that “Kavanaugh’s years-old remarks questioning the landmark ruling that forced President Richard M. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 2:31 pm by David Lat
I recently wondered, on Twitter, whether it’s only a matter of time before everyone in Manhattan has bed bugs. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm by Joe Mullin
In March, New York federal district court judge Robert Sweet ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on summary judgment, saying Myriad's patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes cover parts of the natural world and therefore don't conform to the nation's patent laws. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nor could the court conclude that this was puffery as a matter of law. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
Behrend: the scope of class actions for claims seeking individualized damages; AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:56 am by Jason Shinn
  Also, as an aside, I am often not a fan of arbitration for various reasons, especially in employment matters. [read post]