Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Pimentel (06-1204), United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:18 am
Pierre-Louis cited to the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion in Brown v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Hayrapetyan v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 10:17 am
The court granted the request, made under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.548, that the court will decide questions of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:15 pm
This was both unfortunate, and odd, since the United States Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit had previously held just the opposite.. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
[www.markschwab.us][www.markschwab.us]ny-821133 No. 08-13435-P _____________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________ MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:08 am
United States Fish and Wildlife Service photo of gray wolf OR-7 According to the administrative record, gray wolves historically inhabited most of the United States, including much of California, until they were extirpated from California almost 100 years ago. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
The United States Supreme Court case of South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture issued an inspection certificate for the rice and corn in Woodland, California. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Court’s opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Exercise offederal jurisdiction is therefore improper.CONCLUSIONFor these reasons, this courtVACATES AND REMANDS TO THE DISTRICTCOURT WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO REMAND THECASE TO CALIFORNIA STATE COURT [read post]
International Banking and Finance Provide Grounds for Removal of State Court Action to Federal Court
26 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
Textually, I argue, the Indian Commerce Clause and Indians Not Taxed Clause serve as express authorization for Congress to create legal classifications based on Indian race and ancestry, so long as those classifications are not arbitrary, as the Supreme Court stated a century ago in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
Last week in United States v. [read post]
