Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is the exclusive representative empowered to negotiate with Illinois about wages, hours and conditions of employment for Janus’ bargaining unit. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
Thornton v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
Penal Code §21.02 was specifically challenged in James Dalton Smith vs. the State of Texas, Case No. 18-7967, in the Supreme Court of the United States on Petition for Writ of Certiorari. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
“To create an assignment, a contract must transfer: (1) the entire exclusive patent right, (2) an undivided interest[2] in the patent rights, or (3) the entire exclusive right within any geographical region of the United States. [read post]
Federal Court Seized of Admiralty Jurisdiction Nonetheless Dismisses In Favor of Canadian Litigation
28 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
The witnesses in this case are scattered throughout the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 1610 The Respondent is the corporate trustee of a tax-exempt United Kingdom pension fund. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations, Law at the End of the Day, April 11,… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The expansion of that bi lateral trade and investment model presents the United States with a set of hard choices at the heart of the contradictions of emerging global systems within the traditional parameters of state ideology. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am
The state court had properly noted that Davenport would be entitled to relief under Chapman v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Under United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
Ridgway (1981) and Wissner v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Sec. 337(a), only the United States can enforce the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:47 am
In the immediate face of uncertainty, franchisors with only a small number of franchisee units may withdraw or refuse to locate in California; large, sophisticated franchisors may curb expansion in the state. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:12 pm
Otay Mesa Property v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:08 am
From the onset of United States v. [read post]
