Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 34,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 3:59 pm
Fortinet, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:04 am
In Fei Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:13 am
The LA Law Library celebrates Law Week (and the 50th anniversary of Miranda v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm
” David Spade v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:16 am
(citing Jewel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Beckering v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:08 am
Martinez, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:23 pm
On June 10, 2014, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge issued a decision holding California’s teacher tenure protections unconstitutional in the case of Vergara v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
McDonald v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:24 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:24 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 9:54 am
So it's a quick primer on something you occasionally see but that we typically don't talk about much in law school.Second, on the less academic front, did you know that California food and drug inspectors carry a gun?! [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:15 am
v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
Andris (Summer Associate) (jandris@hillwallack.com ) In a decision that has sparked interest from the beaches of Malibu to the beaches of Sea Isle, a Los Angeles County, California Superior Court ruled that three teacher employment laws – California’s Permanent Employment, Dismissal, and LIFO (last in, first out) Statutes – were unconstitutional.*[1] Decided on June 10, 2014, the case, Vergara v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:21 am
Note: On August 8, 2008 the California Court of Appeals issued its decision in Jonathan L., et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:43 pm
California adverse possession and prescriptive easement law has undergone some evolution in California since its rural beginnings. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
Here are the materials in Burley v. [read post]
