Search for: "FIELDS v. STATE" Results 1761 - 1780 of 11,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2009, 1:10 am
Back in June 2007, IPBiz noted that a response of patent practitioners to KSR v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:57 am by BEN HENRIQUES, CORKER BINNING
The Supreme Court case of R v Guraj [2016] UKSC 65 addressed the issue of when a technicality can frustrate a confiscation order and has produced some interesting guidance on the wider approach to be taken in this field. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm by Karen Harned
As a practical matter, Janus is sure to level the playing field for the many voices that raise a myriad of concerns in state capitals across this country. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:01 am by vforberger
Unfortunately, our old mainframe computer system is not the most flexible, but they are working on a tool that would let them access it remotely, as well as setting up staff to field calls remotely. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:10 am
He failed the field sobriety tests and was subsequently arrested for driving under the influence. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Professor Madison, however, suspects an intentional end-run around reverse engineering fair use law by intentionally asserting only state-law contract claims, copying the proceedings in Bowers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:17 pm by Ilyse Schuman
The bulletin sent to WHD regional administrators and district directors emphasizes that this rule will be enforced in all states, even the nine states under the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit.Before the WHD issued the final tip credit rule, the Ninth Circuit in 2010 had taken the position in Cumbie v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:26 pm by Aviva Cuyler
Both Classen and Prometheus have been closely watched in the biological and pharmaceutical fields, and the Federal Circuit's opinions on remand may shed new light on the scope of § 101 and how the Supreme Court's Bilski v. [read post]