Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2016, 6:57 am
This makes settlement talks difficult, both when talking with opposing counsel and with clients.The case is Wharton v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 1:47 am
However, many cases fall somewhere between these two extremes, with an opposition being only partly successful, and/or the Hearing Officer finding that successful grounds of opposition might nonetheless be overcome by some form of amendment to the patent specification and claims.An example of this last type of outcome is the subject of a recent decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Merck Sharpe & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd v Genentech Inc [2016] FCA 324, which… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Although these types of public accusations may be “vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp,” this form of political speech must remain “uninhibited, robust, and wide-open. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 5:54 am
v=c8U_fcxzsoY The post Can a Digital Device Replace the Staid Legal Pad? [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:03 pm
James v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The Dutch court's reasoning in the parallel case was consistent with the English Court (save they actually granted the relief sought, whereas Kitchin J held that the case for the declaration was arguable) (see Merck Sharpe & Dohme Manufacturing v Ratiopharm Nederland BV and others - February 13 2008 case number/docket number 288241/ HA ZA 07-1689).A new mantra for those clearing the path? [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The Federal Court recently held, in Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:56 am
UPDATE: The Ninth Circuit weighs in the choreography of “Hot Yoga” poses, as opposed to choreographic sequences, in Bikram’s Yoga Coll. of India, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Indeed, last week, the appellate court ruled in Graziadio v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
During its January term, the Court heard oral argument in Vaughn v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 9:07 am
In the first case, Bunch v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
Foreign Minister Wang Yi suggested that the Philippines v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
Which is indeed the case here, since there are other single-family homes in the area.But as for an alleged sharp dividing line between the "psychological and social" impacts here, on the one hand, and "aesthetic" impacts on the other, well, that's less persuasive to me.I have little doubt that Poway will be a tiny bit less aesthetically pleasing after the horse stables get replaced by single family homes. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 11:02 am
On February 12, 2016, in Tvardek v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
In Blank v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:14 am
Additional Resources: One dead in bizarre car accident in Fair Oaks, February 12, 2016, ABC 10, By News Staff More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:26 am
Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
