Search for: "*u. S. v. Frank" Results 161 - 180 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION RULES The SEC was fairly active in 2015 when it came to addressing executive compensation and hedging rules required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
2015 - It's been another busy copyright year! [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
To illustrate this point, he traces the CFTC's interpretation of the statute back to November 2010, just months after the passage of the Dodd–Frank Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am by Jason M. Halper
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Franks plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm by Jason M. Halper
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Franks plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
She could not be compelled to arbitrate her SOX claim because Dodd-Franks amendment to SOX rendered the Form U-4 agreement to arbitrate unenforceable as to that claim. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:28 pm by Erika Frank
Supreme Court issued its ruling in the closely followed religious discrimination case, EEOC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
Watkins/Proctor & Gamble Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Nicole Porter, The Sentencing Project Panel III: The Criminalization of Immigration Law Since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in INS v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
Y v Z (Publicity: Sch 1 Proceedings) [2014] EWHC 650 (Fam), [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported above at p 973) is a judgment on appeal before Bodey J with a rather different factual background, and where the use of material was constrained not by s 98 but by the duty of confidentiality that flows from the duty of full and frank disclosure in financial proceedings. [read post]