Search for: "American Etc. v. Washington Etc."
Results 161 - 180
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:25 pm
You can read the decision here and you can read about it in a number of places (Sports Illustrated, Washington Post, New York Times, Tampa Bay Times, etc.) [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:24 am
Static Control Components and POM Wonderful v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
It all starts with that initial premise: James Madison, American Architect. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:26 am
Tweet Tags: hot coffee, Stella LiebeckLiebeck v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:35 pm
Part V ends the examination with Professor Tong's insights on the debate. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
Settlement of Viacom v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:15 am
Earlier here, etc. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Utility Air Regulatory Group (UTAG) v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
80% of users are not American. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Phelps, Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
Among its many activities, the APHA publishes a journal, the American Journal of Public Health. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
Professor Srividhya Ragavan (University of Oklahoma College of Law), Brook Baker (Northeastern University School of Law), and Sean Flynn (American University Washington College of Law) submitted a statement to the USITC on issues pertaining to India’s patent regime.The statement includes the textSpecifically, TRIPS Article 31 permits compulsory licenses for ANY reason, including the historically sanctioned grounds of insufficient working of an invention in the country. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:48 am
Indus. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
Reasonable interest isn’t enough for predictability.Moderated by: Christine Farley - American University Washington College of LawFarley: asked lawyers for parties to reflect on amici’s arguments.Loy: DRI is closest to right. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:43 am
But NSA is using Section 215 to collect "metadata" that reveals every American’s calling records—calls to your doctor, your church, your partner, etc. [read post]
