Search for: "Beecham v. Beecham" Results 161 - 180 of 434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Holds Pharmaceutical Sales Reps Are Exempt Outside Sales Employees
18 Jun 2012, 4:29 pm by Governmental Affairs Team
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
Washington D.C. Employment Law Update - http://www.dcemploymentlawupdate.com
Supreme Court Holds Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives Not Entitled to Overtime Pay
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
Christopher v. [read post]
San Francisco Employment Lawyer Blog - http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawyer-blog.com/
Supreme Court rules on pharmaceutical sales reps under Fair Labor Standards Act
18 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm by Rebecca DiLeonardo
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/index.php
U.S. Supreme Court rules drug reps are exempt as “outside salesmen”
18 Jun 2012, 12:49 pm by Washington Employment Law Letter
Christopher v. [read post]
Human Resources News - http://employmentlawpost.com/hrnews
Lawffice Links - SCOTUS FLSA Edition 6-18-2012
18 Jun 2012, 10:44 am
Smithkline Beecham case page. [read post]
Lawffice Space - http://www.lawfficespace.com/
Supreme Court Rules That Pharmaceutical Sales Reps are Exempt Outside Salespersons
18 Jun 2012, 10:37 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
SmithKline Beecham is here. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
Supreme Court Limits Deference to Agency Amicus Brief Interpretations: Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Leland E. Beck
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Federal Regulations Advisor - http://www.fedregsadvisor.com/
SUPREME COURT ISSUES OUTSIDE SALES EXEMPTION RULING
18 Jun 2012, 8:48 am by Mark Toth
Supreme Court just issued its much-anticipated ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
Manpower Employment Blawg - http://manpowerblogs.com
Auer Deference Still Up for Grabs?
18 Jun 2012, 8:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
U.S.S.C.: Pharma Reps Outside Sales Exempt
18 Jun 2012, 8:34 am by Andrew Frisch
Click Christopher v. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com
BREAKING: SCOTUS rules pharmaceutical reps are exempt outside salespeople
18 Jun 2012, 8:27 am by Jon Hyman
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Ohio Employer's Law Blog - http://ohioemploymentlaw.blogspot.com/
Just In: SCOTUS Issues Opinon on FLSA Outside Sales Exemption for Pharmaceutical Sales Reps
18 Jun 2012, 8:06 am
Smithkline Beecham. [read post]
Lawffice Space - http://www.lawfficespace.com/
BREAKING: Pharmaceutical Representatives are “Outside Salesmen” Under FLSA; Exempt from Overtime
18 Jun 2012, 7:50 am by Daniel Schwartz
SmithKline Beecham Corp. here. [read post]
Connecticut Employment Law Blog - http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/
Breaking: affirmance in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham
18 Jun 2012, 7:32 am by Ted Frank
A 5-4 decision upholding the Ninth Circuit's ruling that SmithKline was entitled to classify the plaintiffs as outside salesman exempt from the FLSA wage-and-hour requirements. [read post]
Point of Law Forum - http://www.pointoflaw.com/
Today’s Interesting Lineup(s)
18 Jun 2012, 7:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Smithkline Beecham Corp. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
Remaining merits cases: In Plain English
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am by Amy Howe
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 5/14/12
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm by Leland E. Beck
Eli Lilly & Co., avoiding the Christopher v. [read post]
Federal Regulations Advisor - http://www.fedregsadvisor.com/
Best in Law Blogs : The LexBlog Network : May 10, 2012
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm by Colin O'Keefe
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Real Lawyers :: Have Blogs - http://kevin.lexblog.com/
Seventh Circuit Holds Pharmaceutical Reps Exempt Under Administrative Exemption
10 May 2012, 9:22 am by Thomas Kaufman
Christensen v. [read post]
Labor Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
CAFC split on inherency in In re Montgomery
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
 AND see also SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/