Search for: "Board of Public Instruction v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 8:56 am by Jim Gerl
Eighth Circuit: IZM v Roesmount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schs, Independent Sch Dist No 1 70 IDELR 86 (8th Cir 7/14/17) Eighth Circuit ruled that a state statute regarding Braille instruction did not raise the bar for FAPE. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
For publication opinions today (2): In In the Matter of the Adoption of D.C.; H.R. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
., without public dissent, in Virginia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:37 am by Alicia Feichtmeir
This will likely apply across the board to all public sector employees, and will not be limited solely to law enforcement or education. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
DiNapoli would strengthen disclosure of conflicts for employees of state agencies or public authorities, as well as board members and others, engaged in the process. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am by WIMS
There, the Supreme Court instructed that '[a] state moratorium on nuclear construction grounded in safety concerns falls squarely within the prohibited field' and would therefore be preempted. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kiran Bhat
Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, with media coverage focusing exclusively on the latter. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
For publication opinions today (4): In Grover Fitzgerald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The Court of Appeal recorded (at p 2132, para 90) the claimants' argument:"The claimant will be concerned [when he first instructs a solicitor] that, by giving instructions...he is not exposing himself to liability for costs. [read post]