Search for: "Cross v. Davis" Results 161 - 180 of 789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Financial reporting, GAAP, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Amicus Brief of Law and Finance Professors in Verition Partners v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
However, the denial of a cross-motion for summary judgment is only reviewable if that cross-motion sought a disposition of all claims in the trial court. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This claim fails because plaintiff’s various successor counsel had ample time and opportunity to make such a motion, and in fact one did (although it was purportedly abandoned) (see Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by KC Johnson
Supreme Court’s definition of sexual harassment found in Davis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But so many of the ballots in use in American jurisdictions today can be confusing that it would be hard to conclude that Ranked-Choice Voting ballots cross a constitutional line in this regard.The Complaint also points out that Ranked-Choice Voting can promote interest in fringe third parties and distract voters from learning much about the major party candidates, which might make voters’ second- and third-place vote preferences less reliable. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  An appeal against a decision of Arnold J on quantum and a cross appeal on liablity ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
(c) all counterclaims, cross-claims and third party claims; (d) all common law claims, based on contract, tort, fraud, or intentional torts; (e) all claims based on a violation of any state or federal constitution, statute or regulation; . . . [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 4:17 am by SHG
The Supreme Court held in Davis v. [read post]