Search for: "David L. v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Superior Court (NexBio, Inc.) [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
, Inc., Superior Court of Paris, May 22, 2000. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am
District Court Hearing in Cawthorne v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
In February 2016, the 6th Circuit, in a divided ruling that represented the views only of its author (Judge David McKeague), denied the motion to dismiss, holding that it, and not the district courts, had jurisdiction to decide challenges to the rule. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The federal district court dismissed Dr. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
Is this about David slaying Goliath? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Meylan, David E. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Meylan, David E. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Originally, through the court’s decision in In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
Yesterday, seven bishops of the Episcopal Church (USA) -- five active, and two resigned (retired) -- joined the three Episcopal priests in the Anglican Communion Institute in filing an amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief in the Texas Supreme Court appeal brought by Bishop Jack L. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
Bostwick Gary L. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, Connor H. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
See, e.g., Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
Civil Prac & Remedies Code §22.021(2)(B)) extends protection to scholars; whilst the Californian Court of Appeals famously, in O’Grady v Superior Court 44 Cal Rptr 3d 72 (Cal Ct App 2006), interpreted the word ‘periodical’ to find that online journals were protected by state shield laws. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
The PDA was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision two years earlier, General Electric v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
