Search for: "Day v. Justice" Results 161 - 180 of 27,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
You, presumably, care a fair piece about justice, in every sense of that word, right? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
Alito asked Kneedler how police officers would implement such a rule on a day-to-day basis. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
The court issued an order the same day, again finding the allegations were sufficient for the hearing to be held on Tuesday. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am by Trane Robinson
  So, for example, Justice Barrett’s lovely opinion for the unanimous Court in Lindke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In 2010, Irving died and Kenneth took over the day-to-day management and operation of the business. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
One year later, in October 2022, an eight-day trial for resolution of the parenting issues took place. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The day before the arrests, Shafik had testified before Congress over concerns about anti-Semitism on campus. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:32 pm by Michael Oykhman
If prosecuted summarily, the maximum punishment is no more than 2 years less a day of incarceration and a potential fine of up to $5,000. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:07 pm by Michael Oykhman
On appeal, the Justice did not find this argument compelling and found that the sentences were not demonstrably unfit. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
“[A]rrests of people possessing an external container happen all over the country many times every day,” Bembury writes, urging the justices to resolve this question for good. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
So, an employee who agrees to a contract of employment that includes working on their holy day cannot subsequently claim interference with their Article 9 rights because they chose that job and could similarly decide to work elsewhere. [read post]