Search for: "Doe v. Duncan" Results 161 - 180 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 am by Hannah Curtain & George Mallett
In McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 the Supreme Court have confirmed that possession proceedings brought by private landlords are not subject to the same proportionality tests that apply to public sector proceedings. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:56 am by Mark Murakami
As explained in Duncan, "equivalent value must be proven by a comparison of benefits provided-merely comparing old and new premium costs does not establish equivalency. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:56 am by Mark Murakami
As explained in Duncan, "equivalent value must be proven by a comparison of benefits provided-merely comparing old and new premium costs does not establish equivalency. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:56 am by Mark Murakami
As explained in Duncan, "equivalent value must be proven by a comparison of benefits provided-merely comparing old and new premium costs does not establish equivalency. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Duncan, 572 Pa. 438, 817 A.2d 455, 466 (Pennsylvania Supreme Court 2003). [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Thomas filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 5:59 pm
(See the comments of Chief Justice Farris in a slightly different context in Duncan v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]